Legal Considerations Early-Stage Funding For Startups
• 15 Apr 25

"Getting funding is exciting—until you realize the legal complexities that come with it. Protect your startup from the start."
Introduction
Raising early-stage funding for startups is a critical milestone for startup growth. It provides the financial fuel needed for expansion, but it also introduces significant legal risks that can jeopardise control, future fundraising, and even the long-term viability of the business.
Founders often rush into funding rounds in startups without fully understanding how investor terms, equity dilution in startups, and legal agreements impact their future. Failing to address these issues early can lead to costly disputes, loss of ownership, and funding roadblocks.
In this article, we’ll cover the key legal considerations for startup funding, highlight common risks, and provide guidance on structuring funding rounds effectively.
Why This Matters
This is an important issue for startups because:
- Loss of Control: Without proper structuring, founders can unintentionally give away too much power to investors.
- Legal Complexity: Each funding round requires navigating complex legal agreements and compliance requirements.
- Investor Expectations: Not all money is good money—understanding investor terms is critical to avoid restrictive conditions.
- Equity Dilution Risks: Raising funds without planning equity allocations can lead to excessive dilution.
- Future Fundraising Issues: Poorly structured early rounds can create barriers to securing future funding.
- Exit Strategy Impact: The wrong funding terms can make exits more difficult or less lucrative.
Key Legal Considerations For Early-Stage Funding
Startups must be aware of several critical legal aspects when raising capital:
- Structuring Funding Rounds
- Understand different funding mechanisms: equity financing for startups, convertible notes for startups, and SAFEs (Simple Agreement for Future Equity).
- Define clear valuation metrics to avoid disputes on company worth.
- Ensure investor rights are properly structured to avoid governance conflicts.
- Structure the deal to leave room for future funding and avoid rigid terms that can stifle flexibility.
- Equity Dilution and Cap Table Management
- Plan for dilution across multiple funding rounds.
- Maintain a well-structured capitalisation table (cap table) to track ownership stakes.
- Use vesting schedules to protect founder equity.
- Take care to implement equity vesting for all founders and early employees to minimise early departure risks.
- Investor Agreements & Shareholder Rights
- Term Sheets: Define key terms upfront before entering into binding agreements.
- Shareholder Agreements: Outline rights and obligations of shareholders to prevent future disputes.
- Voting Rights: Ensure founders retain control over critical business decisions.
- Negotiate board representation and anti-dilution clauses with caution. Investors often seek veto rights and control mechanisms that could impact founder autonomy.
- Scrutinise liquidation preferences—investors may push for terms that prioritise their payout over founders and early employees.
- Regulatory and Compliance Issues
- Ensure compliance with Singapore’s Securities and Futures Act and other relevant laws.
- Check whether the funding round triggers corporate restructuring obligations.
- Obtain required regulatory approvals if operating in a regulated industry.
- Review cross-border investment restrictions, and ensure corporate records are up-to-date to avoid documentation delays.
- Exit Strategy Planning
- Consider how funding terms impact future mergers, acquisitions, or IPOs.
- Avoid investor rights that restrict your ability to sell the business.
- Ensure drag-along and tag-along provisions align with long-term goals.
- Also clarify what happens to shares during exit events to avoid founder lock-ins or blocked sales.
Common Risks Startups Face During Funding Rounds
The consequences of mishandling legal issues during funding rounds may include:
Legal Implications
- Unenforceable Agreements: Poorly drafted contracts may not hold up in court.
- Breach of Regulatory Laws: Failure to comply with securities regulations can result in fines or legal action.
- Restrictive shareholder agreements in Series A deals may permanently shift control away from founders.
Founder Relationship Issues
- Loss of Majority Control: Founders may lose voting power without realising it.
- Founder Misalignment: Differing views on funding terms can lead to co-founder disputes.
- Equity imbalance between founders can sow long-term resentment if some are perceived to get preferential terms.
- Series A deals can also include founder lock-ins, limiting the ability to exit or pursue new ventures.
Commercial Implications
- Restrictive Investor Terms: Some investors demand rights that limit operational flexibility.
- Funding Bottlenecks: Poor early-stage agreements can make future fundraising difficult.
- Series A investors may impose veto rights or require financial oversight that impacts agility.
- Future funding rounds can be constrained by overly aggressive preference share structures.
Operational Implications
- Investor Interference: Investors with too much control can slow decision-making.
- Pressure to Exit Early: Some funding agreements may push for exits on unfavorable terms.
- Mandatory investor approvals on strategic moves (e.g. budgets, hiring, expansion) can slow momentum.
- Excessive reporting obligations can divert focus from growth.
Business Valuation Issues
- Down Rounds: Poorly structured funding rounds can lead to lower future valuations.
- Over-Dilution: Too much equity given away early on reduces long-term growth potential.
- High Series A valuations may create unrealistic growth expectations.
- Excessive preference shares can significantly reduce founder returns on exit.
The above lists are indicative issues—their relevance depends on your business structure and funding approach.
Case Studies: When Funding Rounds Go Wrong
Case Study 1: The Founder Who Lost His Company
A tech startup raised a seed round with generous investor protections, including preferred stock rights and voting control. As the company grew, the investors used their control to force out the original founder, leaving him with minimal equity.
Lesson: Always structure voting rights to protect founder control.
Case Study 2: The Valuation Trap
A fintech startup accepted funding at an inflated valuation without considering future rounds. When performance didn’t meet expectations, the company had to raise its next round at a lower valuation (down round), reducing founder equity and investor confidence.
Lesson: Be realistic about valuation expectations to avoid down rounds.
Case Study 3: The Exit Restriction Disaster
A startup signed an investor agreement with restrictive exit clauses, including investor approval for any sale. When the founders received a lucrative acquisition offer, the investors blocked it, leading to lost opportunities.
Lesson: Ensure investor rights do not excessively limit exit strategies.
What You Need To Be Doing
We have identified quite a few potential risks that the startup needs to consider. Below are some examples of the types of steps you might want to consider taking to address these issues:
- Define Funding Strategy Early
- Decide whether equity financing, convertible notes, or SAFEs best fit your growth stage.
- Plan multiple funding rounds to avoid excessive early-stage dilution.
- Negotiate Favorable Investor Terms
- Avoid giving investors too much control over decision-making.
- Secure fair valuation terms to prevent unfavourable future funding rounds.
- Ensure Legal & Regulatory Compliance
- Work with legal experts to draft enforceable contracts.
- Ensure compliance with Singapore’s securities laws and corporate regulations.
- Protect Founder Control & Equity
- Use vesting schedules to prevent early founder dilution.
- Maintain a strong cap table management to track equity ownership.
- Plan for Future Exits from Day One
- Ensure investors’ exit rights align with your business strategy.
- Structure agreements to allow flexibility in M&A and IPO scenarios.
The above suggestions are just a few of the steps you can consider taking. There are many more things that need to be done to ensure the associated risks are effectively and pragmatically dealt with.
When negotiating Series A, it’s especially critical to ensure term sheets do not overly favour investors. Avoid provisions like full ratchet anti-dilution, excessive board control, or super-preferred shares that may reduce founder flexibility or ownership in future rounds.
Balancing Legal Priorities And Getting Your Business Moving
We are not trying to be alarmists about the legal issues discussed in this article. How they impact your business will differ based on your circumstances. Some may not be relevant at all.
However, awareness is key. By reviewing the GLS Start-Up Knowledge Hub, you can enhance your understanding of these issues and decide what actions to take.
Startups operate under intense resource constraints—time, budget, and focus are always limited. Sometimes ignoring a theoretical legal risk may make business sense.
That’s not an endorsement of cutting corners, but knowledge is your best asset. This blog is about equipping you with insights to make informed decisions.
Final Thoughts
Raising capital is essential for startup growth, but failing to understand the legal considerations for startup funding can cripple your business.
Series A can catapult your startup to new heights—but only if structured wisely. Don’t just chase capital. Structure for control, sustainability, and long-term growth.
Founders need to be proactive in structuring funding rounds, managing equity dilution in startups, and securing favorable investor terms.
By working with legal experts, planning ahead, and negotiating smartly, you can raise funds while safeguarding your company’s future.
If you need professional guidance, sign up for our GLS Legal On Call Free trial which gives you 3x complimentary calls with world-class lawyers. No strings attached.